Explain Human Relations Theory of Mgt.
#1
What is Human Relations Theory of Management? Into which period of evolution does it fall?
Reply

#2
Human relations approach is one of the neo-classical theory. This
theory was developed around 1920 and emerged out of the human relations movement. This
movement laid greater on the man managing the machines and stressed the importance of individual as
well as the group relationship. The theory emphasises the role of psychology and sociology in the
understanding of individual as well as group behaviour in an organisation. Thus, what was advocated,
was the relevance of the human values in an organisation.

It were Elton Mayo and his associates who conducted studies in the Hawthrone Works of Western
Electric Company, Chicago, U.S A. between 1927 and 1932. The study covered more than 20,000
workers. These studies can be divided into four stages. By these studies, the researchers discovered
many areas of the application of human relations approach. The researchers' general conclusion was
that non-logical behaviour or sentiments among workers must be considered along with economic and
other logical factors as influencing the work group. This approach was advocated by them because of
the following reasons :

(1) Employees in any organisation get satisfaction not by economic incentives but by the satisfaction of
many other social and psychological wants, feelings desires and so on.

(2) The business organisation itself is a social system or at least part of it.

(3) In an organisation, it is ultimately cooperative attitude and not the mere command which yields
results.

(4) Management must aim at developing social and leadership skills in addition to technical skills.

(5) In an organisation, morale and productivity go hand in hand.

The approach was instrumental in effecting a new image of man and the work place. After these
studies, it was widely accepted that the organisation is a social system and the human factor is the most
important element within it. More emphasis was placed on inter personal relations, leadership skills,
human motivation etc. The approach evidenced that an organisation is not merely a formal arrangement
of men and functions ; more than that it is a social system.

The most serious criticism related to the research methodology employed. The theory is based upon
small samples of human beings. Further, it lacks scientific validity and exhibits mysticism.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Difference between industrial relations and Human Relations luttu 1 11,012 01-15-2014, 10:41 AM
Last Post: aarthym
  What are the basic factors involved in Human relations? nbm 1 12,142 12-03-2013, 01:03 PM
Last Post: nbm
  Criteria for Human Relations Approach in an organisation nbm 1 4,591 12-03-2013, 01:02 PM
Last Post: nbm
  What is Human Relations Approach in HRM? nbm 1 9,267 12-03-2013, 01:01 PM
Last Post: nbm
  Explain McClelland Theory of motivation luttu 1 15,985 05-23-2013, 01:02 PM
Last Post: luttu
  Distinguish between McGregor's theory "X" and theory "Y" luttu 1 17,263 05-23-2013, 01:00 PM
Last Post: luttu
  Explain need heirarchy theory of motivation luttu 1 5,071 05-23-2013, 12:59 PM
Last Post: luttu
  Explain the Contingency Theory of mgt rms 1 15,804 09-17-2012, 11:11 AM
Last Post: nbm



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.